[Rspamd-Users] spamhaus/abusix in rspamd or postfix

[Michael Grimm]

Riccardo Alfieri <riccardo.alfieri at spamteq.com> wrot:
> On 24/03/25 16:50, Michael Grimm via Users wrote:
>> Vsevolod Stakhov<vsevolod at rspamd.com> wrote:

>>> Why do you think Rspamd will send more requests than Postfix? I'm pretty sure there should be 0 difference in plain numbers.
>> <snip>
>> This produced a multitude of DNS queries and I closed in to their limit of 5000 queries/day.
>> 
>> After removing the usage of abusix in Rspamd and checking combined.mail.abusix.zone in postscreen I am down to a couple of hundreds today.
> 
> Even a 99.9% FP safe RBL can cause a number of wrong rejections if you are on a very high volume mailserver. Postscreen and such are great if you are low volume, but I'd recommend a weighted system for high traffic servers.
> 
> Seeing that you are talking about free tier, I'd say you are low volume, but this wont apply to every scenario.

I am on a very low volume, indeed. I am absolutely d'accord that Rspamd is the better system in comparison to a simply bot filter like postscreen is.

I was only answering about numbers not about the quality of a service.

BTW: I am using your RBLs as well, besides some others. Never had a false positive, but, again that is due to the nature of my low traffic server (5 users).

Regards,
Michael