[Rspamd-Users] rspamd 3.2, dqs 3.x, and feel like I'm chasing a ghost problem
David Mehler
dave.mehler at gmail.com
Mon Jul 11 07:03:09 UTC 2022
Hello,
Thanks. Anything I can do?
Thanks.
Dave.
On 7/10/22, Riccardo Alfieri <riccardo.alfieri at spamteq.com> wrote:
> On 09/07/22 19:42, Kim Sindalsen via Users wrote:
>
>>
>> Why your system only reports it on some configtests I don't know, my did
>> it
>> on every.
>
> Hi,
>
> that's odd, I'm on rspamd 3.2 and using the latest github rules, but
> rspamd never complains when I issue a rspamd configtest
>
> The fact I'm using the same "SPAMHAUS_ZEN_URIBL" name is because I think
> that's the way to override the lookups done to the public mirrors, that,
> when using DQS, must be avoided.
>
> I'm puzzled as these redefinitions has been there for years and this is
> the first time I hear about warnings during syntax check.
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Riccardo Alfieri
>
> Spamhaus Technology
> https://www.spamhaustech.com/
>
> --
> Users mailing list
> Users at lists.rspamd.com
> https://lists.rspamd.com/mailman/listinfo/users
>
More information about the Users
mailing list