[Rspamd-Users] Invitation to test our latest beta domain blocklist
riccardo.alfieri at spamteq.com
Thu Nov 18 10:49:43 UTC 2021
On 17/11/21 20:33, Vsevolod Stakhov wrote:
> Hello Riccardo,
> I have added support for the full hostnames to the RBL module. However,
> the transition plan is a bit unclear to me.
> If I switch the default configuration to use `dbl-beta` prefix and full
> hostnames being enabled, it will work but then it will be broken
> **after** Jan 31st. If I switch on the full hostnames support but with
> the production `dbl` prefix it will be broken **until** Jan 31st.
> Similarly, if I change nothing, DBL will be broken **after** Jan 31st.
> Apparently, I cannot schedule my Rspamd releases according to your
> release cycles. So without a window when both `dbl-beta` and `dbl` would
> work together with full hostnames there is still a possibility of
> malfunction for the DBL list.
since the abused-legit component of the DBL will be DQS only after 31/01
, I think you can keep the configuration as-is. It will continue to work
for spam domains (that are wildcarded) and the users that want to take
advantage of the improved DBL zone could always register a free DQS
account and install our rules.
More information about the Users