[Rspamd-Users] packaging 3.0 with libfmt and libfu2

[rspamd at vlh.dk]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Users <users-bounces at lists.rspamd.com> On Behalf Of Petr Vanek
> Sent: 21. august 2021 12:24
> To: User questions <users at lists.rspamd.com>
> Subject: Re: [Rspamd-Users] packaging 3.0 with libfmt and libfu2
> 
> Hi,
> 
> On Fri, Aug 20, 2021 at 08:53:44PM +0200, Michael Ströder via Users wrote:
> > HI!
> >
> > It seems two new libs are shipped with 3.0 sources: libfmt and libfu2.
> >
> > What are recommendations for downstream packaging? Use the libfmt and
> > libfu2 from the Linux distro? Or prefer to statically build the libs
> > shipped with rspamd 3.0?
> >
> > I'm asking because I'm trying to update the openSUSE packages. Build
> > works just fine but installation of the package fails with
> >
> > Problem: nothing provides 'libfmt.so.7()(64bit)' needed by the to be
> > installed rspamd-3.0-35.1.x86_64
> 
> I have the same problem with libfmt in Gentoo.

mail ~ # locate libfmt.so.7
/usr/lib64/libfmt.so.7
/usr/lib64/libfmt.so.7.1.3
mail ~ # equery b libfmt.so.7
 * Searching for libfmt.so.7 ...
dev-libs/libfmt-7.1.3 (/usr/lib64/libfmt.so.7 -> libfmt.so.7.1.3)

There's an ebuild for rspamd-3.0 now - but it seems some mails causes rspamd_proxy to segfault and restart.

> > Which -D arguments should I use when invoking cmake and why?
> 
> There is currently non, but I just have sent PR
> https://github.com/rspamd/rspamd/pull/3855 which introduces one.
> 
> Gentoo prefers to use system libraries and to avoid bundled dependencies if
> possible.  https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Why_not_bundle_dependencies
> 
> Petr