[Rspamd-Users] Questions about REDIS and Bayes Learning

[Alexander Moisseev]

On 19.11.18 10:48, Tim Harman via Users wrote:
> On 19/11/2018 7:21 pm, Alexander Moisseev via Users wrote:
> 
>> On 19.11.18 3:02, Tim Harman via Users wrote: On 16/11/2018 9:43 pm, Manuel Garbin wrote:
>>
>> Hi Tim,
>> autolearn will autofeed the bayes DB, that mean that you have 200+ learned.
>> For your question :
>>
>> 1) I've used same command to clean a redis cache, it works
>> 2) disable autolearn if you want use manual learn
>> 3) use header + body and remove the X-spam status header
>> With regards to the first part:
>>
>> 127.0.0.1:6379> HGETALL RS
>> 1) "learns_spam"
>> 2) "100"
>> 3) "learns_ham"
>> 4) "52"
>> 5) "version"
>> 6) "2"
>>
>> This seems to imply that less than 200 of both have been learnt?  Or am
>> I using the wrong REDIS command?
> 
> The command is correct. You can get the same counters using `rspamc
> stat` command.
> At minimum, 200 ham and 200 spam mails need to be learnt.
> 
> Thanks, that's what I thought.
> So my rspamc stat says:
> 
> Statfile: BAYES_SPAM type: redis; length: 0; free blocks: 0; total
> blocks: 0; free: 0.00%; learned: 109; users: 1; languages: 0
> Statfile: BAYES_HAM type: redis; length: 0; free blocks: 0; total
> blocks: 0; free: 0.00%; learned: 61; users: 1; languages: 0
> Total learns: 170
> 
> But I'm getting messages like so:
> 
> BAYES_HAM (-3) [100.00%]
> BAYES_HAM (-0.318029) [75.54%]
> BAYES_SPAM (5.1) [100.00%]
> 
> In my rspamd reports.
> 
> Have I hit a minor bug here?  It doesn't really bother me, it seems to
> be doing a great job of knowing what is spam and what's ham.
> But it seems the rules in the doco/config aren't actually being
> implemented.
> 

Please run `spamadm configdump classifier.bayes.min_learns`. Does it return 200?