[Rspamd-Users] Questions about REDIS and Bayes Learning

[Tim Harman]

On 19/11/2018 7:21 pm, Alexander Moisseev via Users wrote:

> On 19.11.18 3:02, Tim Harman via Users wrote: On 16/11/2018 9:43 pm, Manuel Garbin wrote:
> 
> Hi Tim,
> autolearn will autofeed the bayes DB, that mean that you have 200+ learned.
> For your question :
> 
> 1) I've used same command to clean a redis cache, it works
> 2) disable autolearn if you want use manual learn
> 3) use header + body and remove the X-spam status header 
> With regards to the first part:
> 
> 127.0.0.1:6379> HGETALL RS
> 1) "learns_spam"
> 2) "100"
> 3) "learns_ham"
> 4) "52"
> 5) "version"
> 6) "2"
> 
> This seems to imply that less than 200 of both have been learnt?  Or am
> I using the wrong REDIS command?

The command is correct. You can get the same counters using `rspamc
stat` command.
At minimum, 200 ham and 200 spam mails need to be learnt. 

Thanks, that's what I thought. 
So my rspamc stat says: 

Statfile: BAYES_SPAM type: redis; length: 0; free blocks: 0; total
blocks: 0; free: 0.00%; learned: 109; users: 1; languages: 0
Statfile: BAYES_HAM type: redis; length: 0; free blocks: 0; total
blocks: 0; free: 0.00%; learned: 61; users: 1; languages: 0
Total learns: 170

But I'm getting messages like so: 

BAYES_HAM (-3) [100.00%] 
BAYES_HAM (-0.318029) [75.54%] 
BAYES_SPAM (5.1) [100.00%] 

In my rspamd reports. 

Have I hit a minor bug here?  It doesn't really bother me, it seems to
be doing a great job of knowing what is spam and what's ham. 
But it seems the rules in the doco/config aren't actually being
implemented. 

Thanks! 
Tim