From freekrspamd at beelaertsict.nl  Thu Jul  2 13:40:30 2026
From: freekrspamd at beelaertsict.nl (Freek de Kruijf)
Date: Thu, 02 Jul 2026 15:40:30 +0200
Subject: [Rspamd-Users] rspamadm configtest does not find error in
 /etc/rspamd/local.d/dkim_signing
Message-ID: <0hq7pUH1RK2RiHyNI3Yfvw@beelaertsict.nl>

In dkim_signing I had:

domain {
  example.com
    {
      selector = "dkim";
      path = "/etc/rspamd/dkim/example.com.dkim.pem";
    }
}

so selectors [ {..} ] was missing.

The command "rspamadm configtest" showed "syntax OK".

Is this a bug or a feature?

-- 

fr.gr.

Freek de Kruijf




From freekrspamd at beelaertsict.nl  Thu Jul  2 16:00:14 2026
From: freekrspamd at beelaertsict.nl (Freek de Kruijf)
Date: Thu, 02 Jul 2026 18:00:14 +0200
Subject: [Rspamd-Users] In version 3.11.1 dkim signing does not work in
 version 4.1.1 it does
Message-ID: <lkePdD5OTJ29aCMla6SKsQ@beelaertsict.nl>

I have two openSUSE systems one with Leap 16.0 with rspamd version 3.11.1 and 
Tumbleweed with version 4.1.1.

I checked for differences in /etc/rspamd/modules.d/dkim.conf and /etc/rspamd/
modules.d/dkim_signing.conf and found none. In both I have the same /etc/
rspamd/local.d/dkim_signing.conf with references to the same private dkim 
keys.

In version 4.1.1 the message send with the proper from address gets dkim 
signed, but with version 3.11.1 it is not.

Where should I look for differences that explains the different behavior?

In /etc/rspamd/local.d/logging.inc in both I have:

debug_modules = [ "dkim", "arc", "spf" ];


-- 
fr.gr.

Freek de Kruijf