[Rspamd-Users] Bayes questions and observations

[christian]

Am 14.03.2024 um 18:51 schrieb Vsevolod Stakhov:

> Looks like XY problem to me: why do you need SA for Bayes counting that 
> it uses much more stupid algorithm for it? Of course, your whole problem 
> looks very weird to me. The *only* reason why SA integration exists are 
> testing and legacy concerns (not Bayes or regexps where Rspamd can do 
> much better job).

I still get a lot of spam that isn't recognized. There are batches of 
spam campaigns that come from different senders from different 
countries, with the same appearance but different words on the same 
topic (financial, ?hoonky? kitchen knife), which I can currently only 
block with multimap and regex. But after 2 days the new wave comes.
The statistical function (BAYES_SPAM) is of no help because the results 
are not correct. The email has a value of 20, through ASN, RBL, Neural 
and Reputation. Then BAYES_Spam comes and says the email is ok -2. 
Learning doesn't help. I now learn every spam email again using rspamc 
learn_spam. The results do not improve.

How do you solve this?
Christian