[Rspamd-Users] greylisting optimisation

[Vsevolod Stakhov]

On 21/11/2020 15:56, Gerben Wierda via Users wrote:
> 
> 
>> On 21 Nov 2020, at 15:52, Vsevolod Stakhov <vsevolod at rspamd.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 21/11/2020 14:51, Gerben Wierda via Users wrote:
>>> I am using greylistihng as it does stop a lot of spam.
>>>
>>> However, several parties (like Google) do not send greylisting-frriendly from their farms. To minimise the disadvantage of that I caneither add google.com <http://google.com/> to a whitelist or change the action settings so that it is somewhat more unlikely valid mail is being grey listed.
>>>
>>
>> What do you mean by 'greylisting-friendly'? Rspamd uses full body
>> content for greylisting tokens as well.
> 
> In the sense that some MTA’s are farms where a 4.7.1 temp fail will not be sent by the same client. Like Google. I am under the impression that my rspamd will not accept the same message when it is retried from another server from the farm.
> 
> G
> 

Your impression is wrong and I have explained why previously.