[Rspamd-Users] Update issues? (Probably not directly related to 1.9.0)

[Kilburn Abrahams]

Are you using gentoo, if so the problem lies with the init script and not
rspamd. https://bugs.gentoo.org/680606

On Mon, 18 Mar 2019 at 06:06, Phil Stracchino <phils at caerllewys.net> wrote:

>
> I just updated to rspamd 1.9.0, and once again, upon stopping the
> service, got a slew of several pages of messages linke the following:
>
> 2019-03-17 15:00:49 #28107(main) <ag851i>; symcache;
> rspamd_symcache_validate: symbol 'HFILTER_HELO_2' has its score defined
> but there is no corresponding rule registered
> 2019-03-17 15:00:49 #28107(main) <ag851i>; symcache;
> rspamd_symcache_validate: symbol 'DBL_BOTNET' has its score defined but
> there is no corresponding rule registered
> 2019-03-17 15:00:49 #28107(main) <ag851i>; symcache;
> rspamd_symcache_validate: symbol 'CHECK_RECEIVED' has its score defined
> but there is no corresponding rule registered
> 2019-03-17 15:00:49 #28107(main) <ag851i>; symcache;
> rspamd_symcache_validate: symbol 'MIME_BAD_UNICODE' has its score
> defined but there is no corresponding rule registered
> 2019-03-17 15:00:49 #28107(main) <ag851i>; symcache;
> rspamd_symcache_validate: symbol 'FROM_DISPLAY_CALLBACK' has its score
> defined but there is no corresponding rule registered
> 2019-03-17 15:00:49 #28107(main) <ag851i>; symcache;
> rspamd_symcache_validate: symbol 'URIBL_BLACK' has its score defined but
> there is no corresponding rule registered
> 2019-03-17 15:00:49 #28107(main) <ag851i>; symcache;
> rspamd_symcache_validate: symbol 'R_SPF_FAIL' has its score defined but
> there is no corresponding rule registered
> 2019-03-17 15:00:49 #28107(main) <ag851i>; symcache;
> rspamd_symcache_validate: symbol 'URIBL_SBL_CSS' has its score defined
> but there is no corresponding rule registered
> 2019-03-17 15:00:49 #28107(main) <ag851i>; symcache;
> rspamd_symcache_validate: symbol 'RBL_SPAMHAUS_CSS' has its score
> defined but there is no corresponding rule registered
>
>
>
> Did I, at some point, miss a configuration step or something?  Or is
> this "normal"?
>
> If I missed a step, what do I do to fix it?  I'm OK with wiping all data
> trained so far if that's what's required, since if I missed some major
> step the odds are the data is unreliable anyway.
>
>
> --
>   Phil Stracchino
>   Babylon Communications
>   phils at caerllewys.net
>   phil at co.ordinate.org
>   Landline: +1.603.293.8485
>   Mobile:   +1.603.998.6958
> --
> Users mailing list
> Users at lists.rspamd.com
> https://lists.rspamd.com/mailman/listinfo/users
>