[Rspamd-Users] DKIM signing confusion

[André Peters]

There is not. 

Check the file permission and allow _rspamd to read the key file. 

> Am 19.11.2018 um 11:39 schrieb Markus Rosjat <rosjat at ghweb.de>:
> 
> Hi again,
> 
> so that's what the log tells:
> 
> 2018-11-19 11:34:36 #64493(normal) <aa53ab>; dkim_signing; lua_dkim_tools.lua:34: user is authenticated
> 2018-11-19 11:34:36 #64493(normal) <aa53ab>; dkim_signing; lua_dkim_tools.lua:107: use domain(header) for signature: ghweb.de
> 2018-11-19 11:34:36 #64493(normal) <aa53ab>; dkim_signing; lua_dkim_tools.lua:126: final DKIM domain: ghweb.de
> 2018-11-19 11:34:36 #64493(normal) lua; dkim_signing.lua:159: dkim_signing
> 
> but if I check the header of the mail that got signed as the log said I can't fine any sig for dkim. I use version 1.7.9 of rspamd so if there is a bug (saw the same problem with 1.7.8) could someone confirm this an I will switch to open-dkim tool for signing
> 
> regards
> 
> -- 
> Markus Rosjat    fon: +49 351 8107224    mail: rosjat at ghweb.de
> 
> G+H Webservice GbR Gorzolla, Herrmann
> Königsbrücker Str. 70, 01099 Dresden
> 
> http://www.ghweb.de
> fon: +49 351 8107220   fax: +49 351 8107227
> 
> Bitte prüfen Sie, ob diese Mail wirklich ausgedruckt werden muss! Before you print it, think about your responsibility and commitment to the ENVIRONMENT
> 
> -- 
> Users mailing list
> Users at lists.rspamd.com
> https://lists.rspamd.com/mailman/listinfo/users